Latest Channel Headlines
Public Sector Unions vs. Taxpayers, by Arnold Kling
March 16, 2010, 11:50 am
![]()
1
![]()
The Washington Post reports on cuts proposed in the budget in Montgomery County, Maryland. The proposed budget cuts in Montgomery, which require county approval, reflect not just the recession but also decisions made by officials over many years. Salaries and benefits have risen sharply over the past decade. "There is pain in this budget, for our county and for our county employees," Leggett told subdued county employees and others gathered in a Rockville auditorium Monday. The total budget is down 3.8 percent. "There are some things we will do differently, and some things we will not do at all." Historically, the public employee unions have owned this state. Until I see a "teacher-approved" candidate lose, I assume that the public employee unions still own the state. My guess is that the proposed cuts do not do nearly enough to reduce salary and benefits for "teachers" (probably half of the teachers' union members never set foot in a classroom under our featherbedding system) and other overpaid county workers. And my guess is that when deciding which cuts to approve the County will try to maximize the impact on services while minimizing the impact on employees.
NYS film tax credit key economic driver: comptroller
March 16, 2010, 11:32 am
![]()
5
![]()
Digital City Podcast No. 73: iPad pre-orders; foiling NYC taxi scams, and FFXIII vs. God o
March 16, 2010, 11:19 am
![]()
2
![]()
On this week's show, we find out how many people pre-ordered an Apple iPad (including someone you might not expect), then we check out a huge taxi scam in NYC, undone by ...
Originally posted at Digital City Podcast
Landlords must pay taxes for renters to get credit
March 15, 2010, 9:17 pm
![]()
1
![]()
Quinn won't talk about alternative to tax increase
March 15, 2010, 3:19 pm
![]()
2
![]()
Oil and Gas Companies Warm to Possibility of Higher Taxes at the Pump (CQPolitics.com
March 15, 2010, 1:14 pm
![]()
5
![]()
Rep. Brad Ellsworth: Congress Must Get Tough on Tax Cheat Contractors
March 15, 2010, 12:08 pm
![]()
1
![]()
Before I came to Congress, I spent more than two decades in the local Sheriff's office serving and protecting the people of Indiana. The most basic role of law enforcement is respecting our laws and bringing criminals who violate them to justice. In the Sheriff's office, we would never dream of rewarding those who break the law. Yet, that's just what Congress is doing: rewarding government contractors who are delinquent on their taxes with lucrative federal contracts.
The problem is more widespread than you might think. Studies by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) have repeatedly shown that thousands of federal contractors owe over $5 billion in unpaid taxes. Despite these disturbing numbers, federal agencies are not required to consider tax debts in making contracting decisions. In fact, current law actually prohibits agencies from accessing the tax data necessary to identify and stop these tax cheats from receiving taxpayer-funded contracts.
Everyday Americans play by the rules and pay their taxes; I don't think it's too much to ask companies that receive millions, sometimes billions, in taxpayer dollars to do the same. Not only do these bad actors cheat our government of tax revenue, they also gain an unfair advantage over businesses that are doing the right thing.
That's why I teamed up with Senator Claire McCaskill to introduce the Contracting and Tax Accountability Act. The bill requires contract and grant applicants to give contracting officers permission to check their tax status, and it withholds large federal contracts from businesses and organizations that fail to file tax returns and are delinquent on their taxes.
President Obama introduced similar legislation as a Senator, and he continues to be a strong advocate for these important reforms in the White House. In January, he signed a Presidential Directive ordering the Office of Management and Budget, Treasury Department, and other federal agencies to take steps to prevent contractors who are delinquent on their taxes from receiving new government contracts. While this was an important step forward, it's time for Congress to get tough and hold these tax cheats accountable once and for all.
Our bill is a practical and cost-effective way to ensure all companies compete on an equal playing field and that our tax dollars are being used wisely. By passing these simple reforms, we can begin to restore some needed accountability to the contracting process, as well as the public's trust in Washington.
Tax rises hit Greece as EU to discuss debt crisis
March 15, 2010, 5:04 am
![]()
3
![]()
Do more with tax review: opposition
March 15, 2010, 3:52 am
![]()
4
![]()
March 15, 2010, 2:11 am
![]()
0
![]()
March 14, 2010, 10:58 pm
![]()
0
![]()
March 14, 2010, 8:34 pm
![]()
3
![]()
Grahame Armstrong in the SST writes:
THE GOVERNMENT is putting the finishing touches to its package of tax cuts and is now confident that low and middle income earners will have more money in their pockets – even after paying a higher GST.
The Sunday Star-Times understands the government has settled on lowering the tax rate for those earning between $14,000 to $48,000 – which represents the bulk of wage earners – from 21% to 19%.
The May budget is also expected to lower the tax rate for those earning up to $14,000 from 12.5% to 10%.
The Star-Times also understands the government will, in one hit, lower the top rate for those earning more than $70,000 from 38% to 33%, rather than doing it gradually.
So that would give up three tax brackets – 10% for low income earners, 19% for middle income earners and 33% for higher income earners.
What would be the reduction in income tax for people at various income levels:
That is pretty well targeted. Those on the minimum wage get the largest percentage increase, and everyone earning under $50,000 a year gets a double figure percentage drop in the tax they pay. And in fact, with WFF, many of these people are net tax recipients anyway, not net tax payers.
What would be the fiscal cost?
So total foregone revenue is $2.1 billion.
Now how much extra GST might people pay. Let us assume that on average people spend 90% of their after tax income, and that the GST increase of 2.5% will lead to an average price increase of 2.0% (as estimated by Stats NZ). What is the impact at each income level:
So it does indeed look like no one would be worse off (even if you assume 100% of after tax income is spent).
Obviously those at the top tax brackets do best in an absolute sense, but they are also the ones most likely to be property investors, and may in fact end up worse off overall. Also worth remembering two that half of the 100 wealthiest people in NZ do not actually pay the 38% tax rate, so will not in fact benefit from its reductions – they will just not need to operate through their family trust.
I have no idea if this is the package the Government will go with, but it looks pretty workable, and affordable. Most of all, it is not meant to be about just the redistribution of any changes, but the large benefits to the economy of increasing the incentives to work, save and invest and reducing the incentive to borrow and spend – plus the shifting of incentive for investment income from property to other areas.
Tags: GST, tax, tax cuts, tax rates
In a taxi with @noreaster ready to rock @techcocktail SXSW:...
March 14, 2010, 7:03 pm
![]()
4
![]()
Amazon reacts to new Colo tax, costing affiliates
March 14, 2010, 3:27 pm
![]()
2
![]()
Tax season brings out scam artists (South Bend Tribune)
March 14, 2010, 7:04 am
![]()
5
![]()
A taxi drives along Havana's seafront boulevard "El ...
March 13, 2010, 9:43 pm
![]()
2
![]()
March 12, 2010, 11:09 pm
![]()
0
![]()
NYC: Taxi drivers overcharged riders by $8.3M-plus
March 12, 2010, 8:15 pm
![]()
2
![]()
Secondary Sources: Toxic Asset, Cigarette Taxes, Consumer Satisfaction
March 12, 2010, 10:38 am
![]()
3
![]()
A roundup of economic news from around the Web.
Compiled by Phil Izzo
Tax rise on private car sales hidden: B.C. NDP
March 11, 2010, 10:21 pm
![]()
1
![]()
Channel Comments
No comments. Be the first to comment.
You must be logged in to post a comment.

Learn More
About Gabbr
Pixelate Project